首页> 外文OA文献 >STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
【2h】

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE

机译:随机临床试验的强度和缺点:个性化药物的发展变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) represent the cornerstone of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). Based upon the rules of Good Clinical Practice (GCP), they offer many strengths but also present some weaknesses. The rigorous methodology used allows avoid bias related to confounding factors (through a control group), selection bias (through randomisation) and interpretation bias (through double blinding). However, patients recruited in clinical trials and study experimental conditions markedly differ from the situation in real life. Furthermore, clinical trials recruit a mix of good and poor responders, so that the average therapeutic response is most often mitigated. Clinical trials must evolve according to the new concepts of personalized medicine to become even more performing. In a near future, they must progress from a statistical analysis on large cohorts of patients to a more individualized analysis guided by patient phenotype and genotype characteristics.
机译:随机对照试验(RCT)代表了循证医学(EBM)的基石。根据良好临床实践(GCP)的规则,它们具有许多优点,但也存在一些缺点。使用严格的方法可以避免与混杂因素(通过对照组),选择偏向(通过随机化)和解释偏向(通过双盲)有关的偏见。但是,在临床试验和研究实验条件下招募的患者明显不同于现实生活中的情况。此外,临床试验招募了反应良好和反应较差的人,因此通常会减轻平均治疗反应。临床试验必须根据个性化医学的新概念发展,以实现更高的性能。在不久的将来,他们必须从对大型患者队列的统计分析发展到以患者表型和基因型特征为指导的更加个性化的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号